Pudge isn’t LoDuca. Pudge (presumably) knows what his role is… I’m not sure LoDuca did.
This should be a no-brainer for Nats fans.Â As much as we all love Wil Nieves, Pudge is in a different tier than Wil.
Pudge will be in the clubhouse as much (and maybe more) for what he knows and who he is, than for what he can do. In the most recent Nationals Journal posting, Chico Harlan quotes Jack McKeon about Pudge:
“What a leader he was,” McKeon said. “He not only leads by example, but he was really positive with the Latin players. He’s a guy that took charge. He took charge of that  club. Good guy, comes to play, unselfish, does all the little things. He’s a winner. I heard about the move and I couldn’t wait to see Rizzo to say, ‘Damn, you got one of my favorite guys!’”
Later in our [Harlan and McKeon's] discussion, McKeon explained Rodriguez’s value in relation to the young pitchers he can potentially help.
Speaking about the Nationals, McKeon said, “You’re probably going to get a half a year quicker development from those young guys and that’s where he’ll really pay off. That’s where you’ll really like him.”
As for the salary – critics of the Nationals payroll over the years complain both that it is too low, and that the Nats are wasting their money. As for the wasting part, we can point fingers directly at Jim Bowden, who today said:
“Following in the footsteps of Paul LoDuca and Dmitri Young, another bad [signing] by the Nationals,”
quoted from Dan Steinberg’s D.C. Sports Bog
Seems to me, if anyone would know a bad signing in this world, it would be Jim Bowden…
On the other hand, if Bowden doesn’t like the move, how bad could it be?
If the Nationals get the kind of leadership from Pudge that he’s brought with him for his whole career, $6 million will be a bargain.
No Comments »
No comments yet.