A fan's observations on the Washington Nationals, from across the virtual divide.

Teddy: A Sign of the Times

Marketing has never been a particular strong suit for the Nationals, but The Rushmores, also known as the “Racing Presidents” were an instant success back when they were introduced in 2006. When it comes to fan entertainment at baseball games, the mid-game mascot race, whether you’re talking about variety meats, dinner pastry or presidents, is not particularly new. In a town where national monuments are part of the social fabric, The Rushmores are a perfect match for Washington.

Back when I was in college, one of the first big projects I worked on in communication was a criticism project where we listened to the stories of the employees, and made sense of their narrative using something called Fantasy Theme Analysis. The idea here is that when you talk to people in an organization, they recount their stories using metaphor, as a way to add depth to the example. For instance, an employee might talk about always putting out fires – an indication that someone in the organization is always first to step up, be the hero, but in a reactive way. He or she is responding to crises, rather than showing strategic leadership. Pick your fairy tale or two, and there’s an organization that matches it – whether you’re talking about nurturing parents, authoritarian ship captains or calculating villains. The story-teller uses these metaphors as a way to describe the context in which he or she understands their organization’s culture.

If you were to ask a long-time Washingtonian about the history of sports in the city, it would be the tale of institutionalized, long-term mediocrity. The Senators have their World Series in 1924, but when people talk about it, the narrative is more about how exceptional that event was – Washington’s only World Series. Damn Yankees is the literary parable that memorializes the lovable loser. The Washington Generals are the perpetual foil of the Harlem Globetrotters. The Washington Capitals are holders of numerous milestones of mediocrity, including the worst regular season record ever, and no Stanley Cup Championships in their thirty-five year history. Even the Redskins, with three Super Bowl wins and two NFL championships  in their history, have become more about the hype and preparation, and less about winning. I would even suggest that the Redskins get more and better media exposure when they lose than when they win; a disincentive to winning for a team that is so successful in its merchandising.

Despite our history and culture, Washingtonians certainly have an appetite for winning teams. When the Nats made their improbable run in the first half of 2005, RFK was packed every game. The Caps recent success has filled The Phone Booth. The Redskins sellouts of today were built on “The Future Is Now” philosophy of George Allen. But Washingtonian sports culture has an excuse and tolerance for losing, to the point of accepting it as destiny.

Culture doesn’t change overnight, and it often takes generations. But while mediocrity might feel like destiny, it doesn’t necessarily have to be that way. Joe Gibbs proved that (the first time).

Fairy tales are morality plays we use to teach our values. Which brings me back to Teddy. The Rushmores are the Nats’ fairy tale. They would be cute, even if all of the presidents won from time to time. But the current narrative, where Teddy loses every race, resonates with us because Teddy has become a metaphor for the Nationals. We see ourselves as Washington sports fans in the results of every race. The narrative is protected and continued because there’s a sense that if Teddy were to win, the joke would be over, and if the joke is over, what does that mean for Teddy and the other presidents - and what does it mean for the Nats? The problem is, every time Teddy loses, he reinforces the stereotype of Washington sports as the laughing stock of the nation.

Don’t get me wrong – I am not advocating that we “Let Teddy Win.” It isn’t as simple as staging a win for Teddy, and suddenly the Nationals fortunes will be reversed. What I am suggesting is that we reject the mindset that it is acceptable that Teddy lose every race. In a world where we stop placing value in the Washington sports stereotype, the perpetual loser Teddy ceases to be the compelling character that he is.

I’ve been to nine Nationals games this season. Teddy has lost all nine of those Presidents Races. The Nats have lost eight of those game. Coincidence? Perhaps… but less than you might imagine.

If we start thinking about Sports in Washington, and the Presidents Race differently, is that the end of the joke? Perhaps. But what it needs to be is the end of the Washington Senators, and Washington sports in general, as the iconic model of what the Nationals should be.

So the catchphrase shouldn’t be “Let Teddy Win.”

It should be “Free Teddy. Free the Nationals.”


  • Awesome, awesome, awesome post. I don’t want the “main event” of my baseball games to be a perpetual loss that is endorsed at the highest levels of the team. I go to roughly 35-40 games a year and the whole Teddy losing schtick is disgusting me. Thanks. Now let’s send this off to Kasten!

    Comment by NatsNut — September 28, 2009 @ 12:36 pm

  • I’ve got to agree with you – the Nats and their fans have to drop this loser mentality stuff. Another thing that has to go is that reggae piece that gets played when the Nats lose – “every little thing” is NOT all right, and I’m tired of hearing that it is. Re Teddy, let’s have a real race – it can get spiced up with gags every so often, but I don’t want to keep on with knowing that Teddy will lose. I want to be a winner, and back a winner.

    Comment by Traveler — September 28, 2009 @ 12:58 pm

  • I have been thinking along these lines for a while, but you are eloquent. Thanks Wigi.

    Comment by dcbatgirl — September 28, 2009 @ 2:20 pm

  • Great post. And yeah, what Traveler said: free us from “Three Little Birds”!

    Comment by Hendo — September 28, 2009 @ 5:32 pm

  • In the words of Jack Kent Cooke….My gawd man, what a novel idea, Teddy in front. It is time for a change and Teddy could mark a new beginning.

    Comment by SC Nats Fan — September 28, 2009 @ 6:30 pm

  • Well stated. Put me at the top of the list of those who think the Nats have taken this way too far.

    (though I’m not sure your propensity to attend Nats losses in 2009 can be tied to anything other than the team’s abysmal home record)

    I love the presidents race. It’s uniquely ours and has the power to draw new, young fans to the ball park; but the kids running this thing have injected enough gimmicks to turn it into a bad circus show.

    Comment by Presidents Race Fan — September 28, 2009 @ 8:21 pm

  • I remember saying back in winter 2005 that the team should be named the Grays — the only baseball team to be regular winners in DC history.

    Comment by Section 506 — September 29, 2009 @ 5:53 am

  • Thanks everyone for the comments. Let me clarify a couple things. First, I don’t believe that the Nats lose because Teddy loses. I believe that the fact that the resonant narrative about The Rushmores is the repeated losses of the dominant character, and that Teddy is a metaphor for the Nationals means we accept Teddy’s loss as predetermined, and we’re accepting the same for the Nats. If you think about it from a marketing standpoint, and think of The Rushmores as an ad for the Nats, why would you create a story line where the main character loses all the time? Some will say that the Nats didn’t create Teddy as the main character, but they also didn’t dissuade it from happening once the public started to embrace Teddy. Marketing and public relations are about controlling your image. Every time Teddy loses, they reinforce the message that the Nationals suck (and are bumbling about it)… and that it’s OK that they suck.

    506, I remember people suggesting the name of the team be the Grays, and honestly I didn’t think much of it at the time. I would think differently about it now.

    Comment by Wigi — September 29, 2009 @ 10:09 am

  • Excellent post, and I agree with the premise and the comments.

    Comment by natsfan1a — October 2, 2009 @ 12:07 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment